|
On June 15, the Native Forest Council joined citizens and conservation
groups in a national day of action against the Forest Service's Recreation
Fee Demonstration program, or "Fee Demo." It is a program charging citizens
to visit publicly owned lands. Prior to the day of action, Forest Council
members from across the nation used our online action pages to fax their
senators and tell them that Americans oppose this double taxation. We
also alerted media around the country to spread the word that, even as
politicians are working to make Fee Demo permanent, citizen opposition
is growing.
Council Regional Representative Robert Maris was the first person to
take the Forest Service to task (and to court) in 1997 over Fee Demo.
In federal court Maris won the right to freely access his favorite surfing
spot on a state-owned jetty in Florence, Oregon. Maris organized the demonstration
at the fee collection booth in Florence, one of 30 protests around the
country, to express support for free access to public lands and call for
the end of forest fees nationwide.
From birdwatchers, local business owners, fishermen, surfers and families,
the people who gathered in Florence to show their support for free access
to public lands represented a diverse group. Demonstrators distributed
literature and displayed signs in an effort to raise public awareness
of Fee Demo.
Fee Demo was introduced in 1996 through a rider tacked onto an appropriations
bill. Started as a three year experiment, it has been extended through
2004 by two additional riders. Pushed by the American Recreation Coalition
(ARC), an industry front group with members including Walt Disney Co.,
Outdoor Resorts of America, Coleman and the motorcycle industry, Fee Demo
is the first step toward the privatization and commercialization of our
public lands.
In the Northwest, the program charges $5 per day or $30 per year at trail
heads, parking lots, turnouts, picnic areas and similar sites on public
land. In parks, fees have skyrocketed, from $5 to $20 per vehicle. Fees
are charged at almost 1,400 sites on national parks, forest and BLM lands,
generating an estimated $180 million annually. Visitors who refuse to
pay can be fined up to $5,000 and sentenced to six months in jail (although
no one has ever paid that sum, and only one person has served jail time)
but the average citation is $50.
According to the General Accounting Office, about 20 percent of the fees
go toward program "administration." The remaining fee dollars go to "site
improvements," often involving trail widening or paving, erecting signs,
enlarging parking lots and removing hazard trees. Supporters of the program
claim the extra revenue helps improve facilities, puts a value on recreation
and makes up for the budget cuts imposed by Congress. Derrick Crandall,
president of ARC, explains the industry side in a 1999 L.A. Weekly article:
"The American public feels that recreation on public lands is an incredible
bargain, and is willing to pay substantially more."
Opponents argue that citizens already pay federal income taxes that should
adequately fund the operation and maintenance of national forests, that
Fee Demo disproportionately affects low income Americans and that it is
a regressive tax that bears no relation to the actual costs of recreation.
Federal agencies are using tax dollars to fund destructive activities
such as the timber program, which costs taxpayers more than $1 billion
each year. If the Forest Service shifted even a small percentage out of
extractive activities there would be ample funding for operation and maintenance
of public lands.
Most importantly, Fee Demo is an attempt by private, profit-driven corporations
to change how our public lands are managed. If ARC is successful in promoting
Fee Demo, the door is left open for other private companies that stand
to make a profit from public assets. "We are seeing a paradigm shift from
tax-funded public services to regressive user fees that price out middle
and lower income families," says Scott Silver, executive director of Wild
Wilderness and a leading opponent of Fee Demo. "We are turning America
into a land of and for the elite." If this privatization continues, our
public forests may soon be run by corporations for the "consumption" of
a recreation "product." The profits go to those who manage the land and
sell recreation equipment and services.
Thousands of citizens, more than 240 organizations and numerous counties
and cities object to Fee Demo. The state governments of Oregon, Colorado,
California and New Hampshire have rejected it as well. Anyone who buys
the pass is counted as a vote for the program, but there is no way to
vote against it without receiving a fine or citation.
And many people have opted for the citation. In a notable December 2001
decision, U.S. Magistrate Thomas Coffin found that the Forest Service
had illegally exceeded its 100-site cap by charging fees at 1,349 sites.
This means that the Forest Service illegally obtained hundreds of thousands
of dollars. Congress lifted the 100-site cap shortly after the ruling.
Despite ballooning opposition, lawmakers in Washington intend to take
the "demo" out of Fee Demo, making this fall a crucial time for opponents
to make their voices heard. A bill to make Fee Demo permanent for national
parks was already introduced in May. National Forests are next in line.
It takes determined public outcry to fight huge corporate monetary influence.
Demonstrations, letters and lawsuits around the country are proving that
American citizens won't give away their public land to private interests
without a fight.
Fee
Demo: U.S. Forest Service Playing the Numbers
|